Thursday, August 16, 2007

For the Curious

Here is a list of books that I am either currently reading, or have just finished:

The Future Present by Reggie McNeal
The Organic Church by Neil Cole
The Impossibe Faith (Great book!) by J.P. Holding
The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins
Warrent the current debate by Alvin Plantinga

Labels:

Train Rides and Human Nature

So I ride the train and subway to and from work everyday, and it's been an interesting experience for me. You see, the train and subway are like their own little culture, with their own set of common customs and courtesies. When I first started riding, I had to learn that although I was sitting in the midst of a truly diverse and interesting group of people, saying things like "hello," and "good morning," are not common. Communication is all done by action not words. You don't say "excuse me" to someone blocking your way when you need to get up and move to the aisle, instead you begin to move in that direction and the person gets the hint.

There are plenty of other courtesies, of course, but there is one that is particularly interesting to me. I call it the "enter/exit courtesy," and it goes like this: Anyone who is exiting the train has priority over anyone who is entering. Even if there is a large of group people waiting to get on the train, they must wait until all those exiting the train have done so before they enter. Seems simple right? Like common sense even. Now let me complicate things a bit; let me throw in the "human element." The human element takes the form of a thought; something like: "I want a seat on the train so that I don't have to stand" or "I want to sit in the seniors section so that I'm not bothered by others wanting to sit next to me," or "I can't be late for work," or whatever else you can think of. Whatever the motive, once the human element takes hold, you'll begin to see individuals sneak on the train while others are still exiting. And in worst case senerio, this turns into a domino effect as whole groups of people begin flooding through the doors without regard for those who may need to get off. ...After all, if one person is willing to follow his selfish impulse why shouldn't one more be allowed to? ...or so the logic goes.

Well, this exact situation happened earlier this week. I had just gotten off of work, and was on my way to the train station. By the time I arrived, the platform was already full of people who were waiting for the train. The human element must have been in full effect that day, because as soon as the train arrived and the doors opened, a mob of people begin to rush in. At first it was just a few, then a couple more, but soon, the flood gates opened and bodies rushed in from all sides. Naturally, those exiting the train wouldn't stand for this, so they begin forcing their way upstream through the river of entering bodies. It was a sight to behold!

But then I saw something that angered me. There was still quite a few people who needed to get on the train, and it looked as if everyone who needed to get off had gotten off. But, just as I was about to enter, I noticed that there was still a man who needed to get off, and he was obviously crippled because he walked with a limp. He did manage to put up a furious fight though, battling his way to about 6 feet from the exit before the raging river or bodies overpowered him, and he gave up in frustration. There was nothing he could do but stand where he was at. As he stood there stranded, I looked in amazement as people walked anxiously around him in order to secure a seat.

Now, I had decided to hold my ground and wait outside the train until everyone had exited. At this point, I looked the crippled man in the eyes, gave a quick smile, and indicated that I would wait for him to exit. As I did so, something strange happened: Others who could have easily entered and went around the stranded man, instead decided to wait along with me. In fact, there was an anxious women who got caught behind me against her will. She wanted nothing more then to get on the train and to find a seat, but I was blocking her way in. Once she finally got around me, and noticed that everyone else was waiting for this man too, she changed her attitude and decided to wait as well.

This is an interesting story no doubt, but I think there's more to the story then meets the eye. When I reflect on this event, it tells me two things about human nature:

1. Each of us tends to think, "It's all about me! Me, me, me, me, ME!!!!!!"

2. It only takes a little bit of encouragement FROM OTHERS to break us from this spell, even if only temporarily.

This raises many interesting questions: What does this say about how we ought to live our lives as Christians in a Christian community (the church)? What does this say about accountability? Carrying one another's burdens? How do we keep each other from giving into our own sinful natures? How do we encourage one another? What does this say about passages like Hebrews 10:23-25?

What do you think?

(...btw, I know that I'm the "hero" of this story, but at sometime in the near future I will confess to you another story that shows just how selfish I can be.)

-Tim

Labels:

Monday, August 13, 2007

Schedule of Events

August ...What's left of it ;-)

Tuesday 14 - NO MARS HILL DISCUSSION GROUP!!!!! - Tim needs a break :-)

Friday 17 @ 7:30 Axis College/Career Ministry Continuing Study of Romans

Tuesday 21 @ 7:00 Mars Hill Discussion Group

Friday 24 @ 7:30 Axis College/Career Ministry Continuing Study of Romans

Tuesday 28 @ 7:00 Mars Hill Discussion Group - topic: TBD

September 1st, Service Project! - Movie Day @ 9:30a.m. - 9:00 p.m. - Please remember to let me know what you can help out with! And remember to pray for this event!!!

Labels:

Sunday, August 12, 2007

The Emergent Church

I've decided that is time for me to study the postmodern church (the "emerging" church), so I've now dived into several of their books and websites. In case you didn't know, the Emergent Church—which is notoriously hard to defined—is a new church movement that seeks to reform our current way doing church, and to some extent it seeks to reform our understanding of what Christianity is. They do this mainly by criticizing the current "modernized" church, and pointing out her many shortcomings. …And man, I have to admit, they are quite good at pointing out many of the problems that plague the church today. As I read their material I find that I am constantly challenged by their (often painfully) spot-on criticisms, which almost always demand some sort of action.

That being said, there are quite a few annoyances in their literature as well. One major annoyance for me is how they brush in broad strokes--you either fall into one category or the other; there are no other views, no in-betweens. For example we are told:

Rather than trying to capture timeless truth in objective statements systematized in analytical outlines and recorded in books and institutionalized in schools and denominations, narrative theology embraces, preserves, and reflects on the stories of people and communities involved in the romance of God—always beginning with and always returning to the treasury of stories in Scripture: the good, bad, ugly, and undetermined lives of those who have sought God and found God and lost God and served God and heard and ignored God and opposed God and betrayed God and returned to God and loved God all the more for having been forgiven much. In the process, it seeks to understand the direction and purpose and meaning of the larger narrative (the story of emergence) that these individual stories constitute.
Note the implied false dilemma here. Either we can concern ourselves with "trying to capture timeless truth in objective statements" or we can embrace a view which "preserves, and reflects on the stories of people and communities involved in the romance of God." Either we can concern ourselves with studying the objective truth claims found in some dusty old book, or we can actually have a genuine relationship with God, unhindered by the cold hard facts.

…Excuse me? Why is this an "either/or" situation? Couldn't it be the case that by studying the objective truth claims of scripture, we actually gain a deeper and more meaningful relationship with God? I mean, isn't it the case that the more we learn about Who this God is, the more in awe we are at His love, power, and majesty? Now don't take this the wrong way, I am not saying that the most learned have the deepest relationship with God, nor am I saying that studying the Bible automatically gives us a relationship with God. No, we have to submit to these truths and ultimately to God Who is the source of all truth. What I am saying is that this is not an either or situation. We must concern ourselves with both the truths of scripture, and a relationship with the God Who has gaven us the scriptures as a revelation of Himself. Knowing someone requires that you know at least something about them, and it is in the "timeless truths" found in the "objective statements" of that dusty old book we call the "Bible," where we find God's character revealed

What do you think?

Stay tuned, more insights to follow.

Labels: